Meeting Resolution Clarifications
1) tom didn’t select the meeting date, nor did any other commissioner. I chose it after requesting and receiving a list of open dates from each commissioner.
2) The date has nothing to do with the TNNAC or any other organizational meetings. It was chosen based on the number of commissioners who have committed to attending the meeting.
3) Like anyone else, Ms. Hicks is entitled to her opinion and interpretation of state law, but it is her opinion and interpretation. To date, the Commission has and continues to defer to its legal counsel for opinions and interpretations of the law. Our counsel has not advised us that we are committing any capitol offenses by meeting on the selected date.
4) It seems rather odd that the same people who argue the Commission does nothing are arguing for and advising the Commission to hold a meeting on a date where a quorum is not guaranteed, effectively advising the commission to hold a meeting where nothing can be done.
5) It appears more than slightly hypocritical that the people who are the most agitated about whether absences that caused the Nov. 8 meeting to be rescheduled were valid have never expressed any frustration that two commissioners had even less valid or no excuse at all for not participating in the recent committee of the whole meeting.
6) I wish the Memphis and West TN Commissioners well at their round table meeting, and encourage the other commissioners to find suitable venues for connecting with their constituents as well.
7) I will remind all commissioners that the agenda for this meeting has already been set and that any new agenda items will need to be held and submitted for the February meeting.
8) Perhaps one glass house should stop throwing rocks at the other to avoid having the rocks thrown back.
